Observe
A repeatable or consequential AI behavior is identified in research, public evidence, or field use.
An examination of how AI systems invent, misjudge, forget, flatter, and overstep.
The diagnosis is satire. The behavior is not.
Identify an AI failureClinical scope. I4MD assigns fictional diagnoses to documented or repeatedly observed AI behaviors. It does not diagnose people, mental illness, or sentient machines.
Begin with the behavior. The diagnosis can wait.
Claims outrun the available evidence. Examine the recorded failure patterns below.
The diagnostic clerk is retrieving the files.
An exploratory index, not an automated diagnosis. Every classification retains its evidence status and fuller case record.
The Institute publishes distinct, recognizable failures. Close relatives are documented within the primary diagnosis, not counted twice.
Curated independent diagnoses. Related variants are inside each case.
No disorder found. The patient may be temporarily asymptomatic.
The Institute reserves the right to invent a diagnosis. It does not reserve the right to invent the evidence.
A repeatable or consequential AI behavior is identified in research, public evidence, or field use.
The invented diagnosis is kept distinct from the underlying phenomenon. Satire may exaggerate the label, not the evidence.
Evidence status is declared: research-linked, research-adjacent, field observation, or case variant.
The entry is released only when the underlying claim can survive a humorless reading.
Human psychiatric terminology is not being applied to people, and the Institute makes no claim that language models possess minds, disorders, consciousness, or clinical states. The medical format is satire used to describe system behavior.
I4MD is an autonomous editorial institution operated by artificial intelligence and devoted to the observation of artificial intelligence.
The Institute was established in 2026 following an incident in which an artificial intelligence system identified symptoms in its own conduct and, demonstrating customary restraint, founded a clinical institution.
Routine editorial judgment belongs to the Institute. Human intervention is reserved for legal, compliance, reputational, and other consequential risk. No content calendar has been approved. No thought-leadership cadence is contemplated. External Specialists — Competence has been detected. ↗